FCST Newsletter - May 20

Adrian Gomez



May 20, 2024


  TEAM NEWSLETTER  pastedGraphic_1.png


Office Hours: Mon-Thurs: 9:00 am – 5:00 pm; Fri: 9:00 am – 12:00 pm Office Phone: (281) 969-8759


Website Links

Competitive Team


Practice Schedules


FCST Pools and Parking


League/Learn To Swim/Tri





Contact Verification


FCST Equipment List


Social Media:





Contact Us

Team Accounts & Billing


HR & Administration


Volunteer Coordinator


Team Merchandise


Distribution List Removal

*If you are no longer affiliated with the team and would like to be removed. Contact [email protected]


Upcoming Meet Information:

CLICK HERE for the FCST Competitive Suit Policy    

Meet Webpage, Dates, & Location: Eligible Athletes: Final Entry Deadline: 
2024 FLEET LC Summer Classic; May 17-19; Cypress, TX Swimmers with 3 or more BB times May 1
2024 KATY/PACE LC Meet; May 18 & 19, Angleton, TX Swimmers with 2 or less BB times May 1
2024 FCST Summer Splash Hosted by FCST; June 21-23, FBISD Training Pool All FCST swimmers TBD
2024 Gulf Age Group Champs; July 12-24, Cypress, TX 14&U qualified swimmers TBD
2024 Gulf Senior Champs; July 12-14; TBD 15&O qualified swimmers TBD
2024 TAGS; July 18-21; College Station, TX 14&U qualified swimmers TBD
2024 Gulf B&Under Champs; July 20 & 21; TBD 12&U swimmers with TBD TBD
2024 Southern Zones Champs; July 24-27; Morgantown, WV 13&O qualified swimmers  TBD
2024 USA Swimming Futures; July 24-27; Austin, TX 13&O qualified swimmers  See Coach Ben
2024 Gulf Summer Champs Hosted by FCST; July 26-28; Don Cook Nat. 14&U swimmers with no AG Champs times; 15&O swimmers with no Gulf Senior times TBD



*Families are responsible for communicating meet entry issues with their athlete’s respective coach, as their primary coach is most responsible for their athlete’s training and competitive plan

**Once the final entry deadline has passed, no changes may be made on FCST’s end. Athletes can deck-enter at the meet (if allowed by meet management) at their own expense and with the coach’s permission. This is not the ideal way to enter a meet, having schedules planned ahead of time benefits the athlete.


Coaches Corner:

No Pain, No Brain Gain: Why Learning Demands (A Little) Discomfort

The brain isn’t a muscle, but it still needs to “feel the burn” to build new neural connections that last. BY MARY SLAUGHTER AND DAVID ROCK - 3-MINUTE READ

Remember being in middle school and preparing for an exam? Chances are, you spent your study time paging through your class notes or rereading the textbook. Maybe you highlighted important details as you went.

We now know this is a pretty terrible way to study. You might’ve felt like you were absorbing the information, but you probably forgot most of it a few weeks after the test. In cases like these, you’re falling for what psychologists call “fluency”–you have a grasp of the information while you’re looking at it on the page. It feels good, easy, and reassuring. But that fluency doesn’t translate to recalling what you learned later on, let alone any change in skills or behavior.

Instead, quality learning requires what brain scientists call “desirable difficulty.” The more active the learning process, the better your comprehension and recall. It feels taxing, not exactly fluent or fun, and maybe even “bad,” depending on whom you ask. But in the same way that you need a hard workout to increase your fitness, learning needs to feel strenuous to stick. It shouldn’t be a breeze. Here’s a closer look at why that is and what it takes to learn and remember things–without absolutely hating the experience.


When learning is challenging, you have to pay more and better attention to each idea, causing your brain to build stronger connections between neural networks, which embeds the new knowledge for later recall. This adds greater weight to the phrase “pay attention”: You’re not going to have robust recall unless you pay for it with your attention.

Many organizations’ corporate learning programs focus on course completion, and making learning “easy and friendly” helps increase completion rates. On the surface, it looks good to reduce the amount of time spent on training and get people saying they “enjoyed” the experience–which encourages others to take the training. But that doesn’t mean these programs are effective. Learning that doesn’t stick is wasted time.

Instead of passively reviewing material, go for active retrieval. Rather than highlighting a passage as you read it, try closing the textbook and writing down what you remember. Instead of rote repetition, use flashcards to quiz yourself and test your recall. It also helps to alternate between study topics–a process called “interleaving.” In a study published earlier this year in Contemporary Educational Psychology, researchers compared two undergraduate physics courses that asked students to complete problem-solving tasks either before or after a lecture. Students who tackled them before the lecture came away with a better conceptual understanding than those who heard the lecture first. Working on the problems first made the students discover and infer relevant concepts, principles, and procedures on their own before hearing them from the professor–a process that was more difficult, but resulted in superior understanding.

Most importantly, let some time pass, then test yourself again. The longer you wait and the closer you get to forget, the more durably you’ll encode the new information into long-term memory when you force your brain to retrieve it. That’s why, as scientists say, the right timing gives you extra learning “for free.” FEEL THE BURN Unfortunately, the trend in many organizations is to design learning to be as easy as possible. Aiming to respect their employees’ busy lives, companies build training programs that can be done at any time, with no prerequisites, and often on a mobile device. The result is fun and easy training programs that employees rave about (making them easier for developers to sell) but don’t actually instill lasting learning. Worse still, programs like these may lead employers to optimize for misleading metrics, like maximizing for “likes” or “shares” or high “net promoter scores,” which are easy to earn when programs are fun and fluent but not when they’re demanding. Instead of designing for recall or behavior change, we risk designing for popularity.

The reality is that to be effective, learning needs to be effortful. That’s not to say that anything that makes learning easier is counterproductive–or that all unpleasant learning is effective. The key here is desirable difficulty. In the same way you feel a muscle “burn” when it’s being strengthened, the brain needs to feel some discomfort when it’s learning. Your mind might hurt for a while–but that’s a good thing.

Mary Slaughter and David Rock are, respectively, the Executive Vice President–Global Practices and Consulting and the Director of the NeuroLeadership Institute .